THE
INTRODUCTION OF CHRISTIANITY INTO BRITAIN
(Author Unknown)
THE objection is sometimes made that the
British are not good enough to be God’s nation. Yet many of those who put forward
that objection believe that the Jews alone constitute God’s chosen people. But are
the Jews any better than the British? The Scriptures say:
“Backsliding
Israel hath justified herself more than treacherous Judah” - (JEREMIAH 3:11).
The idea held by some that Christianity was first brought to Britain by the Roman Catholic
Missionary, St. Augustine in A.D. 597 is altogether erroneous as is proved by the
following evidence.
The famous ecclesiastical historian Eusebius, who lived three hundred years before
Augustine came to Britain, and who is well known as the Father of Church History, says “The
Apostles passed beyond the ocean to the Isles called the Brittanic Isles”. This
is confirmed by the early British Historian Gildas (A.D. 516-570) who states, “Meanwhile,
these islands ... received the beams of light that is, the Holy precepts of Christ, the
true Sun at the latter part, as we know, of the reign of Tiberius Caesar”. This
Tiberius Caesar was the reigning Roman Emperor when Christ was crucified. Notice
Gildas’ words “as we know”, of the reign of Tiberius Caesar which
indicates that what he records regarding the introduction of Christianity into Britain was
in his day a matter of common knowledge. Tiberius Caesar reigned from A.D. 14-37,
therefore Gildas’ words, “in the latter part of the reign of Tiberius
Caesar” show that Christianity was introduced into Britain before A.D. 37.
That very early, the Gospel came by the hands of Hebrew is borne out by the finding of two
medals bearing the effigies of our Lord without a halo; one of these was unearthed at Cork
in 1812, under the foundation of one of the very first Christian monasteries ever built in
Ireland, the other under the ruin of a Druidical Circle at Bryngwin, in Anglesey about the
same time. Antiquarians inform us that the Hebrew letter “Aleph” on the
obverse side to the right of the effigy of one of these gives the date as the first year
after the other Hebrew letters signifying Jesus, on the left; the word Messias is on the
collar and the reverse side has an inscription in Hebrew, rendered thus, “Messiah
the Prince, came in peace, and man, life for man became”. On the other medal,
the inscription is different but also in Hebrew and reads “Nought in Thee was
found worthy of Divine Wrath”. (British History Traced, p.132)
“Polydore Vergil in the reign of Henry VII and after him Cardinal Pole (A.D. 1555)
both rigid Roman Catholics, affirmed in Parliament, the latter in his address to Phillip
and Mary, that “Britain was the first of all countries to receive the Christian
faith”. “The glory of Britain”, remarks Genebrard, “consists
not only in this, that she was the first country which in a national capacity publicly
professed herself Christian but that she made this confession when the Roman Empire itself
was pagan and a real persecutor of Christianity”.
This priority of antiquity was only once questioned on political grounds, by the
Ambassadors of France and Spain, at the Council of Pisa, A.D. 1417. The Council, however,
confirmed it. The Ambassadors appealed to the Council of Constance, A.D. 1419, which
confirmed the decision of the Council of Pisa which was a third time confirmed by the
Council of Siena, A.D. 1423, and it was again ruled at the Council of Basle in A.D. 1431
that the British Church took precedence of all others
as being founded by Joseph of Arimathaea - and then acquiesced in this decision laid down
that the Churches of France and Spain were bound to give way in the points of antiquity
and precedency to the Church of Britain, which was founded by Joseph of Arimathaea
immediately after the passion of Christ. Robert Parsons the Jesuit, in his “Three
Conversions of England”, admits, in common with the great majority of Roman
Catholic writers that Christianity came into Britain direct from Jerusalem.
We may, therefore, accept as a general opinion of Christendom, the priority in point of
antiquity over all others of the British Church. This opinion is well expressed by
Sabellius; Christianity was privately confessed elsewhere, but the first nation that
proclaimed it as their religion, and called itself Christian after the name of Christ was
Britain.
It is certain that the primitive British, Irish, Scottish, and Gallic Churches formed one
Church, one communion, and that on the assumption of the Papacy A.D. 606-610 by Rome, this
great Celtic Church, which had previously been in full communion with primitive Rome,
refused in the most peremptory terms to acknowledge her novel pretensions. It is, of
course, the primitive British Church, and not the Roman Church, introduced by Augustine,
A.D. 597, into Kent among the Pagan Saxons, of which such priority must be understood.
That such a Church existed on a national scale, and was thoroughly antagonistic to the
Roman Church in its new form and usurpations in the person of Augustine, is so notorious,
that we may dispense with all but a few testimonies in proof of the fact.
“Britons,” declares Bede “are contrary to the whole Roman
world, and enemies to the Roman customs, not only in their Mass but in their
tonsure.” (shaved hairdo) But the Britons refused to recognise Augustine or to
acquiesce in one of his demands. “We cannot,” said the British bishops,
“depart from our ancient customs without the consent and leave of our
people”. Laurentius, the successor of Augustine, speaks yet more bitterly of the
antagonism of the Scots; “We have found the Scottish bishops worse even that the
British” (The Scots at that time only occupied Dalriada, the territory now
called Argyll).
And the protest of the British Church itself, signed on its behalf by the Archbishop of
St. David’s, six bishops, and the abbot of Bangor, who conducted the conference with
Augustine’s Oak, A.D. 607, places in still clearer light the gulf which the change of
the primitive Roman Church into the Papacy formed between the Churches hitherto in full
communion. It ran as follows:
“Be it known and declared that we all, individually and collectively, are in all
humility prepared to defer to the Church of God, and to the Bishop of Rome, and to every
sincere and godly Christian, so far as to love everyone according to his degree, in
perfect charity, and to assist them all byword and in deed, in becoming the children of
God. But as for any other obedience, we know of none that he whom you term the pope or
Bishop of Bishops, can demand.”...
As late as the twelfth century, no instance could be produced of a British metropolitan
receiving the pall from Rome.
The two British metropolitans of London and York, Theon and Tediac, had retired from their
sees into Wales A.D. 586, ten years only before the arrival of Augustine.
In the Diocletian persecution (A.D.. 303-313) the British Church supplied the following
remarkable list of martyrs; Amphibalus, Bishop of Llandaff; Alban of Verulam; Aaron and
Julius, Presbyters of Caerleon; Socrates, Archbishop of York; Stephen, Archbishop of
London; Augulius, his successor; Nicholas, Bishop of Penrhyn (Glasgow); Melior, Bishop of
Carlisle, and above 10,000 communicants in different grades of society
Its religious institutions were on an immense scale. William of Malmesbury describes the
ruins of Bangor Iscoed Abbey in his days as those of a city - the most extensive he had
seen in the kingdom. Two other British foundations in England retained their superiority
over all others of a later date, under every change of rulers until the Reformation - St
Albans and Glastonbury. Of all the monasteries these continued the most popular and highly
venerated.
Tracing our course back from the Diocletian era a concensus of authorities fixes the
national establishment of Christianity in Britain somewhere about the middle of the second
century. From A.D. 33, then to A.D. 150, we have in round numbers a space of 120 years
left for the propagation of the faith and the gradual conversion of the nation.
All accounts concur in stating that the person who baptised Lucius, or Lleeuer Mawr, the
monarch who thus established the Church, was his uncle St. Timotheus, the son of Pudens
and Claudia, who was brought up on “knees of the Apostles” (St Paul
in Britain, pp 112-117).
The above data clearly prove that the year A.D. 597 was the date of introduction not of
Christianity, but of Roman Catholicism into Britain, Christianity itself having been
brought into the British Isles just after the crucifixion of Christ, more than five
hundred years earlier.
The first six hundred years of Church History in the British Isles is very briefly but
well summarised by John Scott of Glasgow, as follows:
“Christianity came direct to the islands from the East shortly after the death of
Christ in the first century A.D..”
The vigour of its early converts may be gauged by the fact that missionaries from the
British Church founded the Churches of Gaul (France) Lotharingia (Lorraine) and Helvetia
(Switzerland). It was 5-1/2 centuries later that the first papal
emissary in the person of Augustine set foot on these shores. His claim of supremacy for
the Roman Catholic Bishop was rejected by the then
British Church, but his ministry amongst the Angles, Jutes and Saxons, who had recently
immigrated from the Continent, and who, although of the same stock as the Britons, were
still pagan, enabled him to gain a footing and establish a Church on the Island. This
nation was the last and least influenced by the Papacy.
Not only did God lead the forerunning sections of Israel to the British Isles in BC times,
centuries before the main body arrived during the early part of the Christian era, but
even the Druidic religion which these ancient Britons held before accepting Christ was a
preparation for Christianity. It is now well known that the Romans were notorious for
falsifying history in order to magnify themselves and belittle others, especially those
who opposed them.
In no instance was this practice more disgustingly carried out than in the case of their
writings concerning the Ancient Britons and the Druids. Unfortunately these perversions
have even found their way into British School books and the children are taught to believe
the trash that the Romans said about the Druids. Regarding these falsifications we quote
from Early English History, by John Pym Yeatman (Barrister at Law) p.1 04, “The
stories of the atrocities of the Druids were mere inventions of the Romans to cover their
own cruelty, and to excuse it. The religion of a people who were so mild and merciful not
even to imprison their debtors, as did the Romans, could not be bloody”.
In Religions of
Britain, p. 37 Charles Hulbert states, “The charge of staining their
consecrated places with human blood and offering upon the altar of ‘Cor-Gawr’ or
Stonehenge, human victims, hath no real foundation in fact; an accusation as wicked as
unjust”.
On examination, Druidism is found to be but a perversion of the true religion of the
Hebrews, linked up with some of the ritual of the Baal worship. On this point we quote
again from Religions of Britain p.41, “So near is the resemblance
between the Druidical religion of Britain and the Patriarchal religion of the Hebrews,
that we hesitate not to pronounce their origin the same”. Again on page 42 of
the same work, “Next to the Jewish in purity, we consider the ancient religion of
Britain”. Robert Stukely, also quoting ancient authors, tells us that the Druids
represented their God by means of an old Oak selected with two arms ... He also, in common
with Henry and others, says that no images were found in Britain before the Romans
introduced them. (Druidism in Britain, p.15)
The following account of Druid worship is from Hulbert’s Religions of Britain.
“The dress of the druids was white, and that of the druid in his habit of
ceremonial judgement was very grand. On his head he wore a golden tiara and his neck was
encircled by a breastplate of judgement. Their meetings were held in conspicuous places in
the open air, and while the sun was above the horizon, for their laws forbade their
performing these ceremonies in his absence. The premier bard stood in the centre, by the
side of a large stone”.
This circle was denominated Cylch Gyngrair, or the circle of the federation; and the
middle stone, Mean Llog, or the stone of the covenant. Upon the stone altars, before which
the priests officiated, occasionally blazed a large fire, the sacred emblem of that true
God who once manifested his presence “by a bush and a pillar of fire, whose
tremendous voice once issued out
of the midst of the fire, who prescribed a perpetual fire to be kept on the altar of burnt
offerings in Jerusalem, and whom an holy apostle designates with the appellation of
consuming fire.”
Wylie’s History of Scotland, p.71 states: “There is one fact which
throws a pleasing light on these remote times of our country - no idol or graven image has
even been dug up in our soil ... In the lands of Greece and Italy, Syria and of India long
buried deities are ever and anon cropping up and showing themselves in the light of day,
but no such phenomenon has ever occurred on the soil of Scotland. Relics of all sorts have
been found in our soil, but never idol of British manufacture, nor is one such to be found
in any of our Museums”.
On page 110 “There are others who are equally confident that Caledonia was nearly
as brightly illuminated as Judaea itself, and place the priesthood of the Druids only a
little way below the priesthood of the Hebrews”.
Cassell’s History of England states: “The Druidical rites and
ceremonies in Britain were almost identical with the Mosaic ritual”. McDermot,
in his History of Ireland, gives thirteen specimens of identical customs of the
Celtic and Hebrew races.
“Then we have the evidence of Hoare’s ‘Wiltshire’ which states
that the facsimile of a Hebrew breastplate, the same nearly as that originally worn by the
Hebrew high priest, was found in a cist, dug up at Stonehenge, and upon the breast of a
skeleton of a British Druid.” (Druidism in Britain, p.9, also Crania
Britannica)
This essay written by John Pryce, was entitled “The Ancient British Church”,
carried off a prize at the National Eisteddfod in 1876 and in it we read these words: “In
this distant corner of the earth, cut off from the rest of the world, unfrequented except
by merchants from the opposite coast of Gaul, a people, who only conveyed to the Roman
mind the idea of untamed fierceness, was being prepared, ready for the Gospel. It would be
difficult to conceive Christianity being preached to any people, for the first time, under
more favourable circumstances. There was hardly a feature in their national character in
which it would not find a chord answering and vibrating to its touch.
Theirs was not the sceptical mind of the Greek, nor the worn out civilisation of Rome,
which even Christianity failed to quicken into life, but a religious, impulsive
imagination - children in feeling and knowledge, and therefore meet recipients of the good
news of the kingdom of heaven. To a people whose sense of future existence was so
absorbing, that its presentment was almost too deeply felt by them, the preaching of Jesus
and the resurrection would appeal with irresistable force. There was no violent divorce
between the new teaching and that of their own Druids, nor were they called upon so much
to reverse their ancient faith, as to lay it down for a fuller and more perfect
revelation.”
Not only was the ancient British Race the first nation to recognise Christianity, but all
available evidence also goes to show that Glastonbury (in Somersetshire) was the first
Christian Church building in the world and that it was built by Joseph of Arimathaea and
his associates. The famous Vatican Librarian, Cardinal Baronius, discovered an ancient MS
in the Vatican telling of Joseph of Arimathaea, Lazarus, Martha and Mary landing at
Marseilles in A.D. 35. This is in agreement with the early records of English historian
William of Malmesbury, who states that Joseph of Arimathaea (who took care of our
Lord’s body after the Crucifixion) accompanied by eleven missionaries under his
charge came to Britain from France, having been sent by Phillip the Apostle, and that the
British King gave them Ynys- vitrin or Glastonbury and twelve Hides of land. Confirmatory
of this the Doomsday Book contains the following entry:
“The Church of Glastonbury has in its own yule twelve Hides of Land, which have
never paid tax.” (Doomsday Survey, folio p.249b).
The old Glastonbury Chronicle gives the following quaint record of the meeting of Joseph
of Arimathaea and Arviragus, the British King:
“Joseph then counselled the King to believe in Christ: King Arviragus refused
this, nor did he believe in Him. Arviragus the King gave him twice six hides at Glastonia.
Joseph left the rights with those companions in the XXXI year after the Passion of Christ.
These men, with praises built a church of wattles.”
In J.W Taylor’s work, The Coming of the Saints, the journey of Joseph of
Arimathaea is followed place to place from Palestine through Gaul, via Marseilles into
Britain (The Early British Church, p.9, by Rev. L.G.A. Roberts). Furthermore the
early Welsh writer, Maelgwyn of Llandaff (circ. A.D. 450) informs us that Joseph of
Arimathaea is buried at Glastonbury
(Avalon). That Joseph of Arimathaea was the first to preach the Gospel in Britain is also
confirmed by foreign writers, e.g, St. Gregory of Tours in his History of the Franks,
and Haleca, Archbishop of Saragossa in his Fragments.
For a long time Glastonbury (“Isle” of Avalon) was regarded as the most
sacred spot in all Britain. The original Church erected by Joseph of Arimathaea and his
companions was built of wattles. At the present day, the ruins of Glastonbury Abbey stand
on the site of the old wattle Church. That spot has thus been a place of Christian worship
from Christ’s day to the present time. Regarding its antiquity as such, note the
following extracts from the various authorities:
Sir Henry Spelman: “It is certain Britain received the faith in the first age
from the first sowers of the Word. Of all the Churches whose origin I have investigated in
Britain, the Church at Glastonbury is the most ancient”.
Archbishop Ussher: “The British National Church was founded A.D. 36, 160 years
before heathen Rome confessed Christianity. The Mother Church of the British Isles is the
Church in Insula Avallonia, called by the Saxons, Glaston”.
Fuller: “If credit be given to ancient authors, this church at Glastonbury is the
senior church of the world”.
Publius Disciplius: “The church of Avalon in Britain had no other hands than
those of the disciples of the Lord themselves built”.
Theodore Martin (Lovar), in A.D. 1517 states; “It is not too much to say that the
site of St. Mary’s church in the abbey grounds at Glastonbury is the site of the
first known above-ground church in the world”.
Glastonbury has been called the Bethlethem of Britain.
The study of the circumstances which led up to Joseph of Arimathaea choosing Britain as
his final place of residence is interesting. There exists a number of entirely independent
traditions both in France and Britain that Joseph of Arimathaea was a well-to-do tin
merchant. The richest tin mines in the world at that time were in Comwall. Whilst in the
Mendip Hills in Somerset nearby were rich deposits of copper and lead, which form useful
alloys with tin. It is of course well known that a metal trade between Britain and the
near East existed for many centuries and that merchants from Phoenicia and Palestine came
regularly to
Cornwall and Somerset for tin lead and copper. This is mentioned by such classical writers
as Herodotus, Homer, Pytheas and Polybius, whilst Diodorus Siculus gives the details of
the trade route. After the tin was mined it was shaped into slabs or blocks, taken to a
small island, Ictis, which at low tide was connected to the mainland by a narrow path.
This little island is now known as St. Michael’s Mount (near Marazion, Cornwall). The
tin and other metals were taken by boat from the Isle of Ictis to Morlaix, thence
transported across France to Massilia, (now Marseilles) and then shipped to Tyre, close to
the Palestine border. Stories of Joseph of Arimathaea exist at separate places all along
this ancient trade route.
The story is still told “at Marazion in Cornwall of St. Joseph coming there to
trade with tin miners” (Glastonbury - Her Saints, page 66 by the Rev.
Lionel Smithett Lewis, MA). In the Guide to Penzance (Ward, Locke and Co.) it is
stated; “There is a tradition that Joseph of Arimathaea was connected with
Marazion when he and other Jews traded with the ancient tin miners in Cornwall”.
Marazion means ‘bitter Zion’. It’s other name is still Market Jew.
The origin is said to be
derived from the fact that it was a colony of Jews, who traded in tin. “‘Jew’s
houses’, ‘Jew’s tin’, ‘Jew’s
leavings’, ‘Jew’s pieces’ are still common terms in the
Cornish tin mines. The oldest pits containing smelted tin are called “Jew’s
houses”. (Glastonbury Her Saints, page 66). “Amongst the old
tin workers, who have always observed a certain mystery in their rites, there was a moment
when they ceased their work and started signing a quaint song beginning ‘Joseph was a
tin Merchant;.” (Joseph of Arimathaea at Glastonbury, pp 23-24)
It is agreed by most authorities that the Virgin Mary was widowed while Jesus was just a
youth. It is also generally considered that Joseph of Arimathaea was the uncle of Mary,
and took special care over Jesus. Naturally Jesus would be interested in the accounts
which his uncle would give of Britain - a land free from the oppression of Rome, and free
from ecclesiastical fanatacism such as was prevalent in his own country. It is not
altogether surprising therefore to find in different parts of Somerset and Cornwall four
independent ancient traditions that on one of his visits Joseph of Arimathaea brought the
boy Jesus with him to Britain. These are summarised as follows in the Revd C.C.
Dobson’s wonderful little book, Did Jesus Visit Britain as they say in Cornwall
and Somerset?.
1) The first is found in Cornwall and is
recorded in Baring Gould’s “Book of Cornwall” where he writes;
“Another Cornish story to the effect that Joseph of Arimathaea came in a boat to
Cornwall, and brought the boy Jesus with him ...“.
2) The second is found in Somerset of the
coming of Christ and Joseph in a ship of Tarshish, and how they came to the Summerland
(Somerset) and sojourned in a place called Paradise.
3) The third tradition is to be found in the
little village of Priddy on the top of the Mendip Hills to the effect that Jesus and
Joseph stayed there.
4) Finally, traditions associate Jesus with
Glastonbury.
The accompanying map shows the route taken by Jesus and Joseph of Arimathaea, as indicated
by the coordination of all available data. In connection with Paradise mentioned above,
and shown on the map, it is illuminating to observe that on an old ordinance survey maps
the district around Burnham in Somerset was still called Paradise. Even at Burnham today
there is a Paradise Farm. The old well close to the shore of the fine natural harbour at
the mouth of the Camel (in Cornwall) at which the boat conveying Jesus called, is still
known as Jesus Well. In bygone days it was regarded as a holy well, and traces of the
Chapel erected over it remain to the present day.
There is however, evidence that Jesus came to Britain twice by the same route. On the
second occasion he came not as a boy but as a young man, and not as a mere visitor, but as
a resident at Glastonbury in the Isle of Avalon for a considerable period. That Jesus
built for himself a little wattle house for prayer and meditation, near a well at the foot
of the hill known as Glastonbury Tor, and that it was subsequently used by Joseph of
Arimathaea and his associates as a private chapel (as distinct from the church they
erected beside it for public worship) is confirmed by the following extract from the
report which Augustine sent to Pope Gregory during the mission to Britain at the end of
the sixth century:
“In the western confines of Britain there is a certain royal island of large
extent surrounded by water,
abounding in all the beauties of Nature and necessaries of life.” Regarding
this, the Revd C.C. Dobson, MA has
beautifully commented; “Having been taken as a boy by Joseph on this voyage and
visited Glastonbury, Jesus noticed the beauty and quiet of this island. Seeking a
quiet retreat in which to spend years alone before his ministry he returned here as a
young man, erected his own small abode ... and then in prayer and meditation prepared for
his work”. (Did Jesus Visit Britain? pages 26-27). This absence of
Christ from Palestine no doubt explains the Bible’s silence
regarding the early manhood of Jesus.
In that great authority, The Doomsday Book (A.D.1088) there is recorded “The
House of God in the great Monastery of Glastonbury, called the Secret of the Lord”.
But even many centuries before the Doomsday Book was compiled Taliesin, the Prince-Bard
and Druid, wrote “Christ, the Word from the beginning our Teacher and we never
lost His Teaching.” To quote C.C. Dobson again;
“Here is an island unconquered by the Romans, and remote from Roman influence and
authority. The attempt to conquer it by Julius Caesar had proved abortive. Here was a
faith propagated by profound oral teaching, enshrining the truth of the coming Christ,
under the very name Jesu, and the principle of the Atonement. Do we wonder that Jesus came
to reside in a land ripe to receive his truth?” In Britain He would be free from
the tyranny of Roman oppression, the superstition of Rabbinical misinterpretation and the
grossness of pagan idolatory, and its bestial, immoral customs. In Britain He would live
among people dominated by the highest purest ideals, the very ideals He had come to
proclaim. This forcefully brings to our mind the words of Jesus near the very end of His
Ministry, “The Kingdom of God shall
be taken from you (in Judaea) and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits
thereof,” - (MATTHEW 21.43.
So when Arimathaea subsequently came to Britain to proclaim the Saviour under the very
name Yesu or Jesu familiar to every Druid, and as having fulfilled in the Atonement their
basic principle, we do not wonder that he received a welcome at the hands of the Druids.
It is a remarkable fact the Druidism never opposed Christianity, and eventually became
voluntarily merged in it.
In view of the above facts, we can understand why, after his expulsion from Palestine in
A.D. 35, Joseph of Arimathaea was eager to bring the Gospel to Britain and take up
residence at Glastonbury already hallowed by the home of Jesus there. Here Joseph lived
for the remainder of his life. The Welsh poet, Maelgwyn of Llandaff (A.D. 450) records
that on Joseph of Arimathaea’s grave at Glastonbury the epitaph reads as follows:
(Translation) “I came to Britain after I buried Christ. I taught. I rest.”
Maelgwyn also describes the exact position of the grave with meticulous care.
In the instructive little work “Did Jesus visit Britain” pp 31-32, Revd
C.C. Dobson gives the following interesting account of Joseph’s body: “The
Vicar of Glastonbury tells us that Joseph’s body remained buried here until A.D.
1345, when Edward III gave his licence to John Bloom of London to dig for it, and the
Abbot and Monks consented. There is the statement of a Lincolnshire Monk in 1367 that his
body was found. They placed it in a silver casket let into a stone sarcophagus, which was
placed in the east end of Joseph’s Chapel, and it became a place of pilgrimage. There
is a written record of the sarcophagus being still in position in 1662 when the Chapel had
become partially ruined. Owing to fear of Puritan fanaticism prevalent at the time it was
secretly removed by night into the Parish Church Churchyard, and its identity was
concealed by the pretence that the initials on it, J.A., stood for John Allen. In 1928 the
present Vicar of Glastonbury found it half buried in the soil, and had it removed into the
Church, and its construction bears out the accounts of a silver casket which could be
raised and lowered, and shows other marks of identity.”
After Joseph of Arimathaea, the next well known missionary to Britain was Simon Zelotes,
one of the twelve apostles. Dorotheus, Bishop of Tyre (A.D. 303) informs us that Simon
Zelotes preached Christ all along the North Coast of Africa and then crossed to Britain. (Synopsis
de Apostol 9, Simon Zelotes) Next came Aristobulus. The historian Alford (Regia
Fides, Vol 1, p.&3) states, “It is perfectly certain that before St.
Paul had come to Rome, Aristobulus was absent in Britain”.
Haleca, Bishop of Augusta also informs us as follows: “The memory of many martyrs
is celebrated by the Britons, especially that of St. Aristobulus, one of the seventy
disciples”. “Aristobulus, Cyndav and his son, Mawan, men of Israel,
came from Rome with Bran the Blessed to teach the faith of Christ to the race of the
Cymry. (lola MSS.) Again, Dorotheus of the fourth century says, ‘Aristobulus, who is
mentioned by the Apostle in his epistle to the Romans, Romans 16:10 was made Bishop in
Britain’.”
Then came St. Paul to Britain. Theodoretus says “Paul preached the Gospel to the
Britons and others in the West” (De Curandis Graecorum Affectionibus Lib.IX).
After investigation Capellus states, “I scarcely know of one author, from the
time of the Fathers downward, who does not maintain that St. Paul, after his liberation,
preached in every country in western Europe, Britain included” (History of
the Apostles). Bishop Burgess writes “Of St. Paul’s journey to Britain
we have as satisfactory proof as any historical question can demand.” (Independence
of the British Church).
There is an ancient MS at Oxford which refers to St. Paul’s residence in Siluria
(South Wales). In North Wales, the foundation of Bangor Abbey is ascribed to the Apostle
Paul; its doctrine and discipline were known as the “Rule of Paul” and
over each of its four gates was inscribed his precept, “If any man will not work
neither shall he eat”. According to lingering tradition Paul journeyed and
preached as far north as the banks of the River Clyde.
“We must also call attention to the remarkable gift of a Greek MS given to a
French traveller, C.S. Sonnini, who was a member of the Society of Agriculture in Paris,
and had it presented to him by the Sultan of Turkey in 1801. This document asserts that
the Apostle, after visiting Spain, came to Britain and preached upon the Mount Lud
(Ludgate Hill, London) and that the Druids came to Paul and showed him that their rites
and ceremonies were descended from the Jews, and the Apostle accorded them a kiss of
peace” (Druidism in Britain, p.18). Furthermore, we have the old
British “Triads of Paul the Apostle” handed down to us in ancient
Welsh; these are as follows:
TRIADS
(THREES) OF PAUL THE APOSTLE
There are three
sorts of men: the man of God, who renders good for evil; the man of men, who renders
good for good and evil for evil; and the man of the devil, who renders evil for good.
Three kinds of men are the delights of God: the meek; the lover of peace; the lovers of
mercy.
There are three marks of the children of God: gentle deportment; a pure conscience;
patient suffering of injuries.
There are three chief duties demanded by God: justice to every man; love; humility.
In three places will be found the most of God: where He is mostly sought; where He is
mostly loved; where there is least of self.
There are three things following faith in God: a conscience at peace; union with heaven;
what is necessary for Life.
Three ways a Christian punishes an enemy: by forgiving him by not divulging his
wickedness; by doing him all the good in his power.
The three chief considerations of a Christian; lest he should displease God; lest he
should be a stumbling block to man; lest his love to all that is good should grow cold.
The three luxuries of a Christian feast: what God has prepared; what can be obtained with
justice to all; what love to all may venture to use.
Three persons have the claims and privileges of brothers and sisters: the widow, the
orphan and the stranger.
What a contrast between “the evangelical simplicity of these precepts” and
the “monkish and mediaeval inventions and superstitions”!
It is interesting to note that the names of a British prince and princess who had become
Christians, are mentioned in the New Testament by the Apostle Paul. Linus and Claudia,
named in Timothy 4:21 were the son and daughter of British King Caractacus. The verse
reads:
“Do thy diligence to come before winter. Eubulus greeteth thee, (and Pudens mentioned in the verse was the husband of Claudia) and Pudens, and Linus and Claudia, and all the brethren”.
Pudens was a Roman Noble. At the time that verse was written all three of them were living in Rome. Pudens has the distinction of being the only name mentioned in the Bible recorded in stone of ancient date in Britain. Our Great Heritage, p.193f.
Amongst Roman
remains at Chichester, there was dug up in 1723 a stone bearing an inscription in which
Pudens is mentioned in connection with the erection of the Roman Temple there. This stone
is now exhibited outside the Council House at Chichester, and is known as the Pudens
Stone. The incident recorded on it, of course, occurred before Pudens accepted
Christianity. Pudens was a Roman officer stationed at Chichester during the earlier part
of the Roman occupation of Britain, and it was during his stay here that he won the
affections of the British King’s daughter, Claudia. Pudens and Claudia were
subsequently married in Rome in A.D. 53. It is remarkable too, that when the Apostle Paul
came to Britain he should also land on our shores in the region of Chichester Reach and
St. Paul’s Grove at Porchester. On this we quote E. Wilmshurst (St. Paul and
Britain p.11), “In Chichester Harbour, then navigable, in the hamlet of
Creed, in the parish of Boshem was a spot known as Paul’s Wharf, the traditional
landing place of the Apostle, (Sussex Archaeological Collections, Vol XXII 1871) about
A.D. 60”.
From the foregoing evidence it is clear that Christianity was introduced into Britain
immediately after the Crucifixion, history informing us that the first Christian Church to
be erected in the world was Joseph of Arimathaea’s “Wattle Church” at
Avalon (Glastonbury) England, and that it was built by none other than the hands of the
disciples of Christ. After about a century and a half of faithful preaching the ancient
British nation, in A.D. 179, in the reign of good King Lucius, acknowledged Jesus Christ
as the Messiah, and was the first nation to do so; accordingly, Origen, born at Alexandria
in A.D. 185 wrote in the beginning of the following century, “The land of Britain
has received the religion of Christ”. Thus the early British Church was
originally Hebrew, not Papal!
Fuller gives a list of institutions founded by this King Lucius:
1) St. Peter’s Cornhill in London,
circa A.D. 179.
2) A chief Cathedral Church in Gloucester.
3) A Church at Winchester, circa.A.D. 180.
4) A Church and College of Christian
Philosophers at Bangor-on-Dee.
5) A Church dedicated to St. Mary in
Glastonbury, said to be repaired and raised out of the ruins of a former Church, circa
A.D. 187.
6) A chapel in honour of Christ in Dover
Castle.
7) The Church of St. Martins, Canterbury, “understand
it thus: that after ages was new named and converted to the honour of that saint.”
Bishop Fuller tells us that Lucius converted the three Arch-Flamens and the 28 Flamens of
the Druids, into so many Archbishops and Bishops of the Christian Church. He could not
have done this unless the Druids had generally accepted Christianity as a National
Religion. (The Early British Church p.12). The three Arch-Flamens referred to
were located at Caer Troia otherwise known as Caer Lud (London), Caer Ebroc (York) and
Caer Leon (St. David’s).
How deep a root Christianity had taken in the British Isles during the centuries
immediately following the time of Christ may be judged from the following extract from
Chrysostum, Patriarch of Constantinople, A.D. 347-407: “The British Isles which
are beyond the sea (the Mediterranean) and which lie in the Ocean (the Atlantic) have
received the virtue of the Word .... Though thou shouldest go to the ocean, to the British
Isles, there thou shouldest find all men everywhere discoursing matters out of the
Scriptures, with another voice indeed, but not another faith; with a different tongue, but
the same judgement”. (Chrysostomi Orat)
The Ancient Britons of the British Isles thus being the first race to recognise Christ,
became the pioneer nation in missionary work. In this connection the great work done by
the Irish section of the early Celtic Church must not be overlooked. The noble part played
by Ireland in missionary work earned for it the title “Isle of Saints”,
during the early centuries before Roman
Catholicism came to its shores. At that time, “swarms of devoted
missionaries” went out from Ireland to every part of Europe, so much so that Dr
Johnson states that Ireland was the “School of the West” (The Early
British Church, p.13 - Roberts).
“Beatus, a noble Briton, converted and baptised in Britain, converted
Switzerland. His cell, where he died A.D. 96, is still shewn at Unterseen on Lake
Thun” (Theatre. Magnae Britain, Lib. VI, p.9). Mansuetus, born in
Ireland, converted and baptised in Britain, was sent in company with S. Clement of Rome, a
friend and pupil of the Apostles (afterwards the third bishop of Rome) to preach the
Gospel in France. He founded the Church in Lorraine and then penetrated to lllyria in the
East of Europe, East of the Adriatic, where he was martyred in A.D. 110 (Franciscus
Guillman, Helvetiorum Historia, libl, c. 15. Mersaeus De Sanctis German,
etc.). Marcellus, A Briton, became third Bishop of Tongres and founded the Archbishopric
of Treves ... Almost all the Archbishops of Treves were Britons. He lived and died, it is
stated, as a martyr in A.D. 166 (see Mersaeus, De Archiepiscopis Trevir ensium,
and Pantalion De Viris. Illus. Germaniae. Part 1). Cadval, a British Missionary
founded in A.D. 170, the Church of Tarentum in Italy and the Cathedral of Taranto is
dedicated to him(MS Vellum of the Church of Tarentum).” (The Apostolic
Church of Britain, pp.39- 40, Rev. L.S. Lewis). Nor let us forget the work at home
- St. Peiran, an Irishman in Cornwall; St. Patrick, a Scotsman in Ireland; St. Ninian in
Scotland; Keby, a Prince in Cornwall; and Fastidius, Bishop of London; and many others. (The
Early British Church, p.13, Roberts).
The early Church in the British Isles was known as the Culdee Church and it was not until
the coming of Roman Catholics at the end of the sixth century that it became more
generally known as the British Church in order to distinguish it from the Roman Church.
Attached to many of the early Culdee Churches were monasteries, that is colleges (for the
mode of life in them was altogether different from that of most of the monasteries in
Roman Catholic times with which we are more familiar). The reason that there have not been
more records of the ancient Culdee Church handed down to us is that the ruthless
destruction by the Roman Emperors and later by Roman Catholicism was directed not only at
Christians who faithfully maintained their Christian liberty, but also at the records of
their Church.
At the time of the Anglo-Saxon Invasions and settlement, the ancient Celts and Iberians
were as everybody knows, driven mainly to the mountainous regions of the west and north of
the country, while a few escaped to Brittany. Strangely enough, the
Christians of the bulk of these pagan Angles originated from the small Scottish island of
Iona, then known by the older name of Icolmkill, which means “the island of
Columba of the Church”. Synchronous with the arrival of the Anglo-Saxons the
Scots came over from Ireland and settled in Argyll and the Hebrides. When this Scottish
kingdom had been established in the north-west of Britain, the saintly Columba (born A.D.
521) crossed over from his native Scotia (as Northern Ireland was then called) to Iona and
settled there on 12th May, 563 with a view to making it his headquarters for preaching the
Gospel to the pagan part of Britain. His great work and personal influence extended over
Scotland and much of northern England, and as early as A.D. 588 a continental mission
scheme was formed. (The Early Scottish Church, page 216 McLauchlan).
In the same year that Columba died on Iona, that is 597, the Roman Catholic emissary
Augustine landed in Kent. While at first some converts, including King Edwin of
Northumbria, were made to the Roman Church, on the east coast of Britain, yet Boyd
Carpenter in his History of the Church of England states, “within forty
years of the arrival of Augustine, the only place in which his followers held their own
was in the kingdom of Kent”. In 637 when the Northumbrian King, Oswald, desired
to establish Christianity in his kingdom he did not apply to Kent for Missionaries, but to
Iona. Accordingly Aidan was sent and he established a missionary centre on the Island of
Lindisfarne, subsequently known as Holy Island, close to the coast of Northumberland. Here
Aidan and later Cuthbert from Melrose did a great work. The Norseman, however, called Iona
by the name of Holy Island (Eyin Helga). The Gaelic name of Iona was Innis
man Druidhneah (The Island of the Druids) which shows that this little island was a
sacred place even before the advent of Christianity.
A similar missionary centre to these of Iona and Lindisfarne was also established on the
rugged Shetland Island of Foula in the far North and Lindisfarne in the south, to that the
northern half of Britain was indebted for receiving Christianity. This is significant in
view of the fact that the Stone which Jacob used as a pillow at Bethel (the Stone of
Destiny) found its resting
place on Iona at the very time that Colubaand’s associates established there the
headquarters of their great and widespread Christian work.
“In the age of darkness Ireland was the bearer of many torches, and Iona, her
fairest daughter, more than any other, stood for all that was luminous and spiritual, pure
and unworldly. The missionaries of Iona left their mark upon almost every corner of
Europe, and some of their most precious manuscripts rest to this day in European
libraries” - Norseman in Alban, p.23 Robert Lock Bremner. In the eighth
century the library at Iona contained one of the most valuable collections of manuscripts
in the world. “For two hundred years Iona was the lighthouse for the western
nations, whence missionaries went forth in all directions.” - Celt, Druid
and Culdee, p.110 (I.H. Elder).
The account of how the influence of Iona even reached the far north island of Iceland in
the ninth century is given in Norseman in Alban (Scotland). The Norseman Orlyg
was fostered by Bishop Patrick in the Sudreys (ie the Sougherton Isles of Hebrides, as
distinguished from the Nordrieys, i.e. the Northern Isles which comprised Orkney and
Shetland). Orlyg wished to go to Iceland. Patrick gave him Kirkwood and an iron bell, a
plenarium and hallowed earth, which he should lay under the corner posts. Patrick told him
to land where there were two fells visible from the sea, and settle under the southern
one, and in a dale between the two mountains he should build the kirk (the church) and
dedicate it to St. Columba.
Orlyg landed eventually on the great North-West Peninsula of Iceland at a creek
subsequently called Orlyg’s Haven, within a large firth known thereafter as
Patrick’s Firth (Patreksfjorour) to the present day. He wintered there, thence
coasted southward and lost the bell overboard, finally he sighted the fells on the
peninsular of Kjalarnes near Reykjavik answering the subscription given by Patrick. There
he found the bell amongst the seaweed, and so built the church as instructed and
worshipped under the mantle of St. Columba.
From the mass of foregoing evidence it is clear that Britain was the leading nation in the
pioneering of Christianity, and today, we are still the foremost race on earth in regard
to the spreading of God’s Holy Word-the Great Bible Societies which were founded last
century have done an enormous work in this respect. It is interesting to note that the
extending influence of Britain’s Sea Power and the impulse to exploration during the
sixteenth century were accompanied by an impulse to spread the Gospel. On this point the
Encyclopaedia Britannica, under the caption “Modern Missions” states:
“The development of the Maritime power of England which the Portugese and the Spanish
monarchies noted with fear and jealousy was distinguished by a singular anxiety for the
spread of the Christian Faith. Edward VI in his instructions to the
navigators in Sir Hugh Willoughby’s fleet, Sebastian Cabot in those for the intended
voyage to Cathay and Richard Hakluyt, who promoted many voyages of discoveries in addition
to writing their history, agree with Sir Humphrey Gilbert’s chronicler that ‘the
sowing of Christianity must be the chief intent of such as shall make any attempt at
foreign discovery, or else whatever is built upon other foundation shall never obtain
happy success or continuance’.
It is also a remarkable fact that the phenomenal growth of Bible Societies and Foreign
Missions and the rapid expansion of the British Empire have been simultaneous.
“Today more than 90% of the funds for Foreign Protestant Missions are subscribed
by Anglo-Saxons.”
During the year 1931 the Scriptures distributed by the American Bible Society, the British
and Foreign Bible Society, and the National Bible Society of Scotland, to mention only
three, reached the colossal total of over twenty-eight millions. Allowing for inter-sales
this figure would still be well over twenty millions. It is translated into more than a
thousand languages. The total distribution of Scriptures by all other nations combined for
the same period is only a few thousands. Verily He has found His witnesses in Anglo-Saxon
Israel. (Is Civilisation Doomed? pp.4-5) How evident that Anglo-Celto-Saxondom is
God’s nation Israel doing His work!